Alberta Oil, Marketing & Retail News are KRW finalists for magazine of the year
Labels: awards, Canadian Business Press, KRWs, Magazines Canada
Labels: awards, Canadian Business Press, KRWs, Magazines Canada
Labels: Canadian Business Press, Magazines Canada
Unfortunately, the funding formula of the past programs - the CMF and PAP - and the one initially proposed for the CPF fail to fully appreciate the cultural and economic contribution of business-to-business (“B2B”) publications. The formula favours a consumer-publication model that does not apply to B2B publications....
While the Canadian Business Press applauds the Government of Canada for revisiting the eligibility criteria for its new program, we are concerned that B2B magazines will continue to be underrepresented and that many publications will cease to be viable.Although the trade press represents 27% of magazine titles in Canada, the document said, restrictions on the various funding formulas have -- and threaten to continue -- to receive less than 8% of government funding.
Despite representing approximately one quarter of Canada’s magazine industry (by any reasonable measure), B2B periodicals have always received a lower proportion of funds designed to support the magazine industry.The submission says that the policy needs to better address the challenges faced by the b2b press:
This inequity was always justified in the past by the need to support the extension of Canada’s “culture” through magazines. Yet, a closer examination of the criteria actually supported more successful consumer-oriented magazines indistinguishable from U.S.-based competition rather than important or leading edge publications that emphasized a uniquely Canadian cultural perspective. The most glaring example is that eligibility provisions such as weight were part of the criteria – the heavier the magazine, the more subsidy it received. A glance at your average popular consumer magazine will reveal that much of the magazine’s content, and therefore weight, is comprised of paid advertisements on heavy glossy paper. Therefore, the more ads the publication sells (and therefore the more successful it is) the more the magazines qualified for funds under the program.
The difference between the two is a distribution model and not based on content or importance to the Canadian magazine industry. Both are viable business models for magazines. “Request” is a common model for industry-based B2B magazines and “paid” is a common model for consumer magazines. Both types face exactly the same business challenges – rising postal and distribution rates, foreign competition, the struggle to secure advertisers, the transition to digital media – yet “paid” subscription-based magazines continue to be favoured in the funding formula.
Labels: Canada Periodical Fund, Canadian Business Press, funding
Labels: Canadian Business Press
It's a definite sign of the times that the new Canadian Business Press directory is published digitally. Working with Texterity, the Guide to Business and Professional Publications provides thumbnails of all CBPs 156 publications; the directory is searchable and contains live links to the various individual publication and publishing company websites.Labels: b-to-b, Canadian Business Press
Labels: Canadian Business Press, trade
“We are pleased that CBP will continue the Mags U tradition,” said North Island president Alexander Donald. “We have been great partners for many years, and we feel this agreement that clarifies ownership is in the best interests of both Mags U and the industry at large.”
“The Magazines University trademark is very important to us at the CBP because the name has been associated with quality and excellence within the magazine publishing community,” said Alex Papanou, Chair of the CBP. “The CBP and its partners will continue to provide our industry with a quality event that we can all be proud of.”
Interestingly, the name Magazines University is only North Island's to sell because it trademarked the brand in 2002 to the surprise of its then partners. The collaborative and cooperative approach that had begun many years before soon deteriorated. Magazines University had been launched in 1992 as a collaboration between the Canadian Periodical Publishers Association (the predecessor to Magazines Canada) and Masthead and later involved other partner organizations to a greater or lesser degree, including CBP and CMC. The industry associations provided the seminars and Masthead ran a trade show and a joint working group shared marketing, costs, revenues and responsibility for the event.
Labels: Business to business, Canadian Business Press, conferences, professional development
Labels: Business to business, Canadian Business Press, international trade, Magazines Canada
The board of Magazines Canada is recommending to its members that trade magazines be welcomed as members. The proposed bylaw change will be considered at the Magazines Canada annual general meeting in June and would remove the restriction on trades from its bylaws which have, until now, allowed membership only for consumer magazines.Labels: Canadian Business Press, Magazines Canada
Boyd would not confirm an actual figure, but Masthead estimates less than 10 entries were received, which would put the loss of revenue for the CBP at around $14,000. Rogers also pulled its $2,500 sponsorship of the awards earlier this year. No Rogers editors were present at the KRW Peer Judging panel held last week. Several Rogers entries came from freelancers, Boyd said.Rogers and some other trade publishers are known to be in conversation with Magazines Canada about offering membership and services to b to b publishers or creating some sort of trade publishing division.
Labels: Business to business, Canadian Business Press, KRWs
The Canadian Business Press, representing about 42 publishing companies and about 170 trade magazines, has cut a deal with its American counterpart, American Business Media, to give members non-voting access to all the resources of the U.S. association. The arrangement became effective June 5.It is also important to point out that the agreement in no way inhibits the ability of the Canadian Business Press to aggressively support the Canadian policy on Canadian ownership and content rules; and other matters related to international trade and the publishing sector, says the announcement.(Interestingly, while this arrangement is clearly important to CBP, there is no mention of it on the ABM website.)
Labels: American Business Media, Canadian Business Press, trade