Competition policy is OK, with a few exceptions, Magazines Canada tells the feds
Magazines Canada has told a federal competition review that all it wants for the magazine industry is a fair and level playing field and it thinks that's pretty much what it has -- with a few exceptions.
In a submission released today, the association told the Competition Review Policy Panel that it wanted the federal governments variety of policy instruments to continue and to be improved to ensure a "competitive, open and dynamic sector". It recommended no changes be made to the current investment review law, which dates back to 1999 and the Canada-U.S. Agreement on Magazines.
However there are inequities in the current regime, the submission said, and these competitive disadvantages need to be addressed. Among them:
In a submission released today, the association told the Competition Review Policy Panel that it wanted the federal governments variety of policy instruments to continue and to be improved to ensure a "competitive, open and dynamic sector". It recommended no changes be made to the current investment review law, which dates back to 1999 and the Canada-U.S. Agreement on Magazines.
However there are inequities in the current regime, the submission said, and these competitive disadvantages need to be addressed. Among them:
- Direct to consumer pharmaceutical advertising, a huge category, is forbidden to Canadian magazine publishers under the Canada Health Act but are regularly carried by the large number of U.S. originating titles.
- While Canadian publishers have to pay for 50% of the costs of recycling their magazines, U.S.-originating magazines evade the levy.
- The provincial liquor commissions who publish magazines and use their monopoly position to essentially suck up all the beverage alcohol advertising.
Labels: competition policy, Magazines Canada
1 Comments:
Fair and level playing field... Funny, that's what freelancers want as well.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home