Adbusters turned down in bid to sue for commercial air time
Adbusters argued that the CBC and Canwest Global had violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But the court's refusal to let the case proceed effectively means that the Charter does not apply in this case, (according to an Adbuster's press release).
The magazine has until the middle of March to appeal the decision by Mr. Justice William Ehrcke.
“It’s outrageous that the fast food, oil and automobile industries can buy as much TV time as they want in order to promote their agendas, but citizens are not allowed to talk back,” said Adbusters Editor-in-Chief Kalle Lasn in response to the ruling. “Canadian democracy will not work properly until we the people have the same right to buy airtime as corporations do.”
The rejected Adbusters ads pointed out that over 50 percent of the calories in a Big Mac come from fat, called for an end to the age of the automobile, and promoted Buy Nothing Day. While Court Justice William Ehrcke ruled that private broadcasters have the right to run whatever ads they like, Adbusters feels the case raises some troubling questions.
Firstly, why are Canwest and the CBC selling as much time as they possibly can to corporations, while fighting expensive legal actions to keep citizen-produced messages off the air? Why does the CBC call itself “Canada’s Public Broadcaster” if they won’t sell airtime to citizens?
Secondly, why is the CRTC not standing up for public access? When they grant licences to broadcasters, why is the right of Canadian citizens to access their own “public” airwaves not being guaranteed? Thirdly, why is our freedom of speech being suppressed? Why can corporations buy airtime while citizens cannot? Why doesn’t the Canadian Charter apply to the most powerful social communications medium of our age - television?
“This case goes to the very heart of what our democracy is all about,” says Lasn. “A healthy society allows its citizens to walk into their local TV stations and buy airtime under the same rules and conditions that corporations do. Adbusters has been given 30 days to challenge the ruling. This legal battle for media democracy will go on.”
2 Comments:
I applaud Adbusters' efforts, but I do wish they would make ads with a higher production value. Regardless of message, a commercial that isn't well done won't hold anyone's attention. If I owned a television station, I'd turn down their ads purely on a quality basis.
Does anyone know what the final outcome of this was?
Were the ads ever shown on TV?
ps if you, the moderator, are seeing this comment 3 times, it's because I don't know if I've failed the captcha test and need to repost or if indeed the comment is in line to be moderated. By the way, I choose to comment anonymously in case that makes a difference in your troubleshooting.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home