Publishers want to be Apple tablet-ready, without losing control
U.S. magazine and newspaper publishers are discussing the possibility of creating their own digital storefront tailored to the much-anticipated Apple tablet.
A story in Advertising Age reports publishers want to avoid the fate of the music industry, which became captive to iTunes (which dictated download music prices to them). And they don't want to see repeated what happened with Amazon's Kindle (which exerts total control over magazine and newspaper subs, refusing to provide publishers with information about their own subscribers).
A story in Advertising Age reports publishers want to avoid the fate of the music industry, which became captive to iTunes (which dictated download music prices to them). And they don't want to see repeated what happened with Amazon's Kindle (which exerts total control over magazine and newspaper subs, refusing to provide publishers with information about their own subscribers).
"There's a lot of activity right now at all of the major newspaper and magazine publishers around 'What is our role?'" said one magazine executive this week, who declined to speak on the record because of the sensitivity around interactions with Apple. "A lot of the conversations are around 'We need to control the customer relationship.' We are not interested in doing an Amazon thing or even an Apple thing where they own the data...."The goal of an industry digital storefront or other strategies is to make the most of new reading devices without making the mistakes of the past and without letting the makers of the devices gain all control, the story said.
"People put their hands out and let [Steve Jobs of Apple] put the handcuffs on them," he said. "The same thing now is happening with the publishing industry. They are afraid to do anything, to say anything. At the same time, they're saying, 'Let's see what other options we have.'"A magazine executive said:
"In the music industry, the iPod itself had the dominant control over the experience. Once the iPod controlled the experience and was the element that was the most dramatic improvement, the content became a commodity on the device, and the device became the experience.""If publishers were to get together and agree at least on what the format would look like then the device companies don't dictate so much that they define pricing and distribution."
Labels: digital, online, technology
4 Comments:
Wow what a bunch of fearful do-nothings. For years the major publishing companies sit around and do nothing to innovate, and now they're afraid of apple? of amazon? Whatever they come up with now will probably be more stopgap half-measures.
Apple and Amazon built their dominance through decades of innovation. Apple built the technology and user experience for the iTunes store and the i-devices through hundreds of thousands of manhours of experimentation and development.
The only way publishing co's will be able to make it right is to invest now for the future.
Take $50,000 and seed funding for micro-media startups within the pub companies themselves. Run your own "Google summer of code", except name it "The Random House Winter of Textual Discontent" and seriously think about how people, the written word, and the ideas embodied in centuries of publishing can interact.
I never understood why companies won't give up a comparatively tiny amount of money upfront for experimentation and innovation in order to prevent someone from obsoleting your entire business model.
As far as I can see, no publisher (at least in Canada) really get it yet. They run "social media" campaigns, but don't think about the actual end product that they sell.
Also notable: the Apple Tablet doesn't exist.
It is much anticipated, but, thus far, vaporware. Apple has announced nothing to do with it; they've actually denied having anything to do with anything resembling a tablet. Rumors.
Isn't it interesting that publishers -- and God knows they have enough other things to worry about -- take such "vapourware" seriously enough to strategize about how to take advantage of it?
I guess it's reasonable to plan for hypotheticals. Though I wonder if they've considered the three or so other tablets, which look a lot like the rumored Apple Tablet, that have come out recently.
They could beat Apple to the punch by pooling resources and bolstering a different platform (or several of them). And then they could deal with magazine iTunes when and if it comes.
I guess it's all easier said than done though. But I can dream.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home